Determination of the Dissociation Constant

and Molar Mass for a Weak Acid

 

 

Abstract:  We will determine Ka and the molar mass for an unknown weak acid by using a pH meter to record the pH at intervals during the titration with sodium hydroxide.   The titration curve and its first derivative will be plotted to establish the equivalence point.

 

Introduction

The strength of an acid is defined by its ability to donate a proton to a base.  For many common acids, we can quantify acid strength by expressing it as the equilibrium constant for the reaction in which the acid donates a proton to the standard base, water, as shown in the equations below:

 

            HA + H2O  Û  H3O+  + A-,                                          

 

for H3CCOOH:                       

 

H3CCOOH + H2O  Û  H3O+  + H3CCOO -              

 

The equilibrium constant for a reaction of this type is called the Acid Dissociation Constant, "Ka", for the acid HA.

 

A convenient method for determining Ka is to measure the pH of a solution of the acid after a strong base has been added to half neutralize it.  We can calculate the amount in millimoles (mmol) of base added by multiplying the volume in mL by the concentration in mmol per mL, which is the same as the molar concentration (in moles per liter) since both the numerator and denominator are divided by 1000: 

 

                       

                       

                        n(mmol) = V(mL) x C (mmol/mL)

 

For example, if 10 mL of 0.10 M NaOH is added to 20 mL of 0.10 M acetic acid, the solution will initially contain 10 mL x 0.10 mmol/mL = 1 mmol of NaOH, and 20 mL x 0.10 mmol/mL = 2 mmol of acetic acid.

 

                        OH-       +         H3CCOOH  Û H2O  + H3CCOO-

init                    1 mmol 2 mmol

change -1 mmol           -1 mmol                       +1 mmol          

final                  0 mmol 1 mmol             +1 mmol

 

since the reaction goes essentially to completion, the 1 mmol of NaOH will be completely consumed, converting 1 mmol of acetic acid to acetate ion.  Then [HA] = [A-] = 1 mmol/30 mL = 0.033 M.  The Ka expression is simplified because equal terms cancel out:

 

   =   

             

Thus at the point of half-neutralization, Ka = [H3O+] or pKa = pH, where

 

            pKa = - log Ka,           just as

 

            pH = - log [H3O+].

 

The Henderson-Hasselbalch equation,

 

           

           

gives the same result, since the second term is log 1, or 0.

The treatment for a diprotic acid is essentially the same:  A diprotic acid has two Ka's:

 

                        H2A + H2O <=> H3O+ + HA-

 

                        HA- + H2O <=> H3O+ + A2-

 

The two Ka's can be determined separately using the same methods suggested here for monoprotic acids.

 

Titration Curves

In order to determine the pH at half-neutralization for an unknown acid, we will measure the pH with a pH meter after each addition of base, and create a "Titration Curve" which resembles the one in the figure below.  The experimental setup is shown at right.  A 200 mL beaker contains the acid dissolved in distilled water and a magnetic stirbar, so that the magnetic stirrer motor below can be used to continually stir the mixture during the titration.  The pH electrode is supported by a clamp on the left, while the burette is held by a burette clamp in the right of the beaker, with its tip well below the lip of the beaker to prevent titrant loss by splashing. 

At the beginning of the titration, from 0 mL to about 20 mL of added base, the pH changes very little with each addition, and 1-2 mL of base can be added at a time.  But after about 20 mL, as the titration approaches the equivalence point, the pH changes drastically with very small additions of base.  Here it is necessary to add small volumes of base (»0.1 mL) at a time, in order to get sufficient points to define the shape of the curve.

The equivalence point is the volume at which the slope is greatest, or at which the inflection point occurs1, where the line changes from upward curvature to downward curvature. In this titration the equivalence point occurs when about 22 mL of base is added, and the pH is 9.

The equivalence point can be determined visually, or an interesting method developed in calculus can be used.  The "first derivative" is actually the slope of the line at a given point.  It can be estimated numerically by calculating the slope of a line in the region of the point, and the LIMSport spreadsheet KA_DET uses this method.  If the first derivative of the titration curve is plotted, it looks like the figure shown here.

The first derivative has a maximum at the equivalence point where the slope of the titration curve is greatest, indicating  large pH changes with small volume additions.  By the way, the second derivative is the slope of the first derivative, so it will be zero at the equivalence point, where the slope of the first derivative is horizontal.

The first derivative is

DpH/DV = (pH)2-(pH)1/ (V2-V1), but this is the average slope between points 1 and 2, and cannot be paired with either (pH)1 or (pH)2 for plotting, as we are forced to on a spreadsheet.  To solve this problem, three pH values are used, and the derivative is paired with the middle (pH)2 one in the plot.  It is calculated from the pH and V values half way between the central value and the next higher and lower values:

Once the equivalence has been determined, the pH can be read half way to the equivalence point, and from it the Ka of the acid, as described above.

If the acid were diprotic, there would be two inflection points in the titration curve above, and the pKa's would be equal to the pH at points halfway between 0 and the first equivalence point, and halfway between the two equivalence points.

 

Preliminary Titration

            Since the acid is an unknown, it is impossible to predict what volume of base will be required to titrate a given mass.  To work efficiently while using the pH meter, we want to add larger volumes of base until just before the pH changes rapidly near the equivalence point, and only then add small volumes so that the inflection point can be determined accurately. It usually saves time if a fast, approximate standard titration with an indicator is done first to determination the mass of acid which will require 25 mL of base solution. 

Having the equivalence point occur at 25 mL is appropriate for 50 mL burettes, because it gives good precision without using excessive volumes of base. Then, during the pH meter titration, base can be added rapidly until the equivalence point is approached. For example, you might start with 2 mL increments for the first 16 mL, then 1 mL increments up to 23 mL, gradually reducing to 0.1 or even 0.05 mL increments very near the equivalence point. The approximate titration can be done with phenolphthalein to determine the endpoint, or it can be done by using the pH meter to determine the equivalence point, but by adding 1 mL of base at a time and determining the pH after each addition.

 

Determination of the Molar Mass of the Acid

            Since the molar mass is the amount in moles of a given mass of acid,

 

M(g/mol) = m(g)/n(mol),

 

it can be determined for a monoprotic acid by titrating a known mass to determine the amount of H+ present.  Since one mole of H+ reacts with one mole of OH- in the titration,

 

n (H+).= n (OH-) = C(M)  x  V(L)  = C(mol/L) x V(L)  =  C(mmol/mL) x V(mL)

 

Note that for a monoprotic acid like HCl, the amount of acid equals the amount of hydrogen ion titrated (  ), but for a diprotic acid like H2SO4, the amount of acid is ½ the amount of hydrogen ions titrated, .

 

Prelaboratory Assignment

Procedural

1.  From the titration curve shown earlier, estimate the change in pH that would result from the addition of 1mL of .1 M NaOH to 25 mL of .1 M acetic acid (a) at the beginning of the titration; (b) after 21 mL had been added; and c) after 30 mL had been added.

 

2.  Why is it necessary to do an indicator-based titration before the pH meter titration?  How does the pH meter titration differ?

 

3.  Does it matter how much water is added to dissolve the unknown acid?  Why or why not?

 

Theoretical

4.  Determine the mass of  acid which should be used in the titration if it is found in a preliminary titration that 0.100 g of the acid requires 8.0 mL to titrate.   Hint:

5.  In the titration curve shown it the introduction, the equivalence point occurs at 22.0 mL, so the half-equivalence point is at 11.0 mL.  From the plot, estimate the pKa and Ka for the acid.

 

6.  What is the molar mass of a monoprotic acid if 0.200 g of the acid requires 22.5 mL of 0.15 M NaOH in a titration? 

 

7.  How would you write the Excel equation to calculate

            a.  the mass of acid requiring 25 mL of NaOH from the mass and volume of titrant in step 4?  Assume that the mass of acid is in cell A9 and the volume of NaOH required in A11.

            b.  the equivalent weight of the acid in step 11?  Assume that the volume of NaOH is in F40 and the concentration in F44.

 

 

Procedure:

 

1.  Place a 250 mL beaker on the balance and tare it.

 

2.  Add about 0.2 g of one of the unknown acids, and record the unknown number and the mass on the spreadsheet below.

 

3.  Add  25-50 mL of distilled water to the acid in the beaker, swirl to dissolve the acid, add a few drops of phenolphthalein indicator, and titrate to the endpoint with 0.1 M NaOH solution.  If the acid dissolves slowly, you may start the titration before it is all dissolved.  Be sure not to approach the end point until all acid dissolves, however.  Added base converts the acid to its more soluble, ionic conjugate base.  You may do this titration with the pH meter if you wish, adding 1 mL at a time and proceeding much more rapidly than you will for the final titration below.

 

4.  Determine how much acid would require 25 mL of base.

 

5.  Dry off the outside of a 250 mL beaker, place it on the balance, and

 

6.  Add the mass of acid calculated in part A, and record the mass.

 

7.  To the acid in the 250 mL beaker, add 50 mL of distilled water, add a magnetic spinbar (and universal indicator if you wish), and activate the stirrer to dissolve the acid.

 

8.  Calibrate the pH meter with the standard buffer solution, then rinse the electrode and immerse it in the beaker on the stirrer.    Position the burette so that titrant can be easily added.

 

9.  Record the pH, then add 1 mL of 0.1xxx M NaOH solution at a time, recording the pH after each addition, until the pH changes more that 0.2-0.3 units when 1 mL of NaOH is added.  At this point, decrease the volume of NaOH added so that the change in pH is small enough to yield a good plot.  After the rapid changes near the equivalence point, the volume of NaOH may again be increased to 1 mL per additon.  Make at least 10 additions after the equivalence point.

 

10. Plot the pH (Data Series 1), 1st Derivative (Data Series 2) and 2nd Derivative (Data Series 3) vs. Volume NaOH (X Values).

            To help visually determine the equivalence point, activate the graph, click on the x-axis values, and in the format box which appears, select the scale tab and set the maximum and minimum values 1 mL above and below the equivalence point.  If grid lines are added (right mouse button) every 0.1 mL, the equivalence point can be determined precisely.  If it is still difficult to read the equivalence point, only the Schwartz Plot can help.

 

11. On the plot of your choice, show how the equivalence point and pH at half equivalance point are calculated or determined, and enter the volume of NaOH required to reach the equivalence point in the appropriate cell.

            Record the exact concentration of the NaOH solution, and calculate the MW of the acid from its mass and amount calculated from titration data.

 

12.  Read the pH at half equivalence and record it.  From this value, calculate the Ka of the acid.


 Some Common Acids:

                                                                                   

Acid

M

Ka1

pKa1

pKa2

Acetic

60.05  

1.80 x 10-5

4.74

 

 Potassium Hydrogen Phthallate

204.23

3.89 x 10-6

5.41

 

Oxalic  

126.07

5.89 x 10-2

1.23

4.19

Malonic  

104.06

1.48 x 10-3

2.83

5.69

NaHSO3    

104.06

6.31 x 10-8

7.2

 

NaHSO4       

120

1.20 x 10-2

1.92

 

NaHC2O4   

130.03

6.46 x 10-5

4.19

 

Ascorbic 

176.14

6.76 x 10-5

4.17

 

NaH2PO4      

120

6.17 x 10-8

7.21

12.37

KHSO4    

136

1.20 x 10-2

1.92

 

KH2PO4     

136

6.17 x 10-8

7.21

12.67

KHTartrate   

188

1.51 x 10-5

4.82

 

Malic       

134

3.98 x 10-4

3.4

 

 

 

Equipment & Supplies

 

pH electrodes dipped in pH4 buffer/1% KCl storage solution.

0.2 g of unknown acids (supplied in capped, 20 mL vials for convenience)

Standardized 0.1 M NaOH solution

Buffers for calibrating pH meter, with commercial preservative/indicator added, in stoppered 250

 mL Erlenmeyer flasks.

Phenolphthalein indicator in dropper bottles

Universal indicator in dropper bottles (optional)

(1) 250 mL beaker

Weighing paper

 

Projects

I.  Other Titrimetric Methods:

a.  Devise a gravimetric titration, using the interfaced balance, but not using a burette.

b.  Devise a thermometric titration, using a burette and a thermistor, rather than a pH probe, to determine the equivalence point.  See the Project after the Thermochemistry experiment.

c.  A conductimetric titration is described below.

II.  Precise Determination of Equivalence Points

            We determined the equivalence point visually in this experiment, but that may not be satisfactory in some cases were high precision or a highly reproducible mathematical method is desired.  Several methods have been used, as described below.

 

A.    Linearization:  The mathematical description of the equilibria involved in the titration can be linearized, or put in the form y = mx + b, and the titration data can be plotted so that the equivalence point can be determined from an intercept or slope.

A “Gran Plot2 is perhaps the best known method.  In it, the volume of base, Vb is plotted on the x axis, and the product of Vb and [H+] is plotted on the y axis.  The intercept of this [H+]*Vb vs. Vb plot with the Vb axis is the equivalence point3.  A spreadsheet is set up to accept titration data and create the Gran Plot.   A second graph is created with only points on the linear, downward sloping portion of the trace.  A trendline is inserted, and the equation an R2 value printed on the graph.  The equation must be selected, then the Format/Selected Data Labels/Number menus used to specify Scientific notation with 5 decimal places.  With this precision, solving the equation for y=0 gives a good value for the equivalence point.

The Gran plot is based on approximations, and different forms must be used depending on whether a strong or weak acid is involved, and for different portions of the titration curve. 

More recently the Schwartz Plot has been developed 4 which suffers from neither of these drawbacks.  The linearized equation which describes the hydrogen ion concentration[H+]  in a titration of Va ml of acid, as a function of the volume of added base, Vb of concentration Cb is

 

            [H+]Vb  = (Veq - Vb’) Ka

 

where   Vb’ = Vb + (Va + Vb)([H+] - [OH-])/Cb

 

From the first equation, it is clear that a plot of [H+]Vbvs. Vb’ will give a straight line of slope Ka and it intercepts the x axis (where y =  [H+]Vb’ = 0) at Vb’ = Veq.

            Before spreadsheets were common, the calculations necessary to do a Schwartz plot would have been formidable, but we can do them with a little effort.  Since [H+] = 10^-pH, and [OH-] = Kw/[H+], an expression for Vb’ can be entered in a column following your titration data, with each term calculated from the volume of added base or the pH.  The constants Kw = 1 x 10-14, the concentrations of acid and base (Ca and Cb), the initial volume of acid solution Va are also entered in spreadsheet cells.  In an experiment like this one where the acid is supplied as a solid rather than as a solution of volume Va and concentration Ca, the Schwartz Plot seems inappropriate; fortunately, the result for the equivalence point is very insensitive to the values of Ca and Va, so estimates of 0.1 M and 25 mL can be entered in the appropriate cells as estimates.

            After the [H+]Vbvs. Vb’ plot is created, a second graph is created with only points on the linear, downward sloping portion of the trace, and the equivalence point is determined as above for the Gran Plot.

 

B.  Nonlinear Curvefitting

            Spreadsheets and other mathematical software packages frequently include nonlinear regression, or “curvefitting” routines, which fit the data to a nonlinear mathematical expression (like a polynomial, for example).  Once the mathematical expression is known, it can be used to interpolate values to any desired precision.  In other words, we could calculate the [H+] for volume increments of, say, 0.001 mL, using the equation.  Then the first or second derivative curves can be calculated to give a very precise equivalence point, since the maximum of the first derivative, or zero crossing of the second, can be determined to any desired precision.  Unfortunately, the limited precision and limited number of fitting functions provided by most spreadsheets, and the complex nature of the titration curve, prevent facile use of this method.  Even if 4th or higher polynomial fits are attempted, and if the equation (on the graph) is selected, and the Format Object menu is used to increase the number of decimal places to 6, good fits cannot be obtained.  Good results are obtained with dedicated curve fitting or mathematics packages, generally by using a “cubic spline” to generate enough points to allow accurate calculations of first and second derivative curves.

 

III.  Identify by titration the acid in vinegar; Vanish granular toilet cleaner; lemon juice; or determine the phosphoric acid content of Coca ColaÒ or Pepsi ColaÒ as follows5: Dilute the .1xx M NaOH to 0.01xx M by adding 10.00 mL with a burette to a 100 mL volumetric flask and diluting with distilled water to the mark.  Boil 100 mL of soda for 20 minutes in a 250 mL beaker covered with a watch glass to remove CO2. Titrate 25 mL of the cooled soda with 0.01 M NaOH, using a calibrated pH electrode.  Repeat the titration with 25 mL of 0.1 M Phosphoric acid titrated with 0.1 M NaOH.  Compare results.

 

IV. Conductimetric Determination of Ka:  Since the conductance of a solution of the weak acid HA is a measure of the concentration of H+ and A- ions, a measurement of conductance of a solution of known [HA] concentration should allow us to calculate Ka, and indeed this method has contributed greatly to our knowledge  of solutions.  You may want to review the earlier experiment called “Conductivity and Stoichiometry.”  A method might involve measuring the conductivity, L (in Siemen) of pure, distilled water, adding a weak acid to make a solution of known total concentration, and measuring the conductivity again.  Now we must determine what ion concentrations this conductivity corresponds to, and to find out, we can take a known, 100% dissociated acid, like HCl, and measure its conductivity as a function of concentration. For example, the conductance of 50 mL of distilled water in a clean beaker, delivered from a burette could be measured, then 0.100 M HCl added from a burette in increments as the conductance was measured.  When the conductance matched that of the weak acid, the volume and concentration of the HCl and total volume of the solution in the beaker could be used to calculate the concentration of [“HCl”] = [H+] = [Cl-].  This would be the concentration of the [H+] and [A-] in the weak acid solution having the same conductance (assuming that the same concentration of Cl- and A- have the same conductivity, which is only approximately true).  Alternatively,  a conductivity vs. concentration plot could be constructed, and regression analysis used to obtain the conversion factors for calculating concentration from conductivity.  Appropriate unknown acids are trichloroacetic acid (a strong acid used as a proteolytic agent for destroying warts), mono- and dichloroacetic acid, and the mono-, di-, and tribromoacetic acids; acetylsalicylic acid; 3-chloro- or 3-bromopropionic acid, and glacial acetic acid.

IVB. Percent dissociation of a weak acid as a function of concentration:  Measure the conductivity of 50.00 mL of distilled water, and add a solution of weak acid from a burette.  Plot L vs. C and compare to the plot for HCl obtained above.

 

 

Footnotes

1.  This is an approximation [see Meites, L., and Goldman, J.A., Anal.Chim.Acta  29, 472 (1963)] but not a bad one.

2.  Gran, G.  “Determination of the Equivalence Point in Potentiometric Titrations II,” Analyst 77, 661-671 (1952).

3.  Filby, G.  “Spreadsheets for Chemists,”  VCH Publishers, New York, 1995, p. 210.

4.  Schwartz, L.M.  “Advances in Acid-Base Gran Plot Technology,” J. Chem. Educ., 64, 947-950 (1987).

 5.  Murphy, J. “Determination of Phosphoric Acid in Cola Beverages,” J. Chem. Educ., 60,420 (1983).